Thread: Vu+Duo2

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 44
  1. Collapse Details
    #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,268
    Post Thanks / Like
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support our site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site
    Just uploaded the latest nightly build for OpenVix and the blindscan menu will not allow frequencies to be changed. But, while scanning it shows the correct frequency scan for the satellite.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    8,287
    Post Thanks / Like
    Can you post a screenshot of the firmware version info?
    I have had problems (bugs) with some of the nightly builds. I only use online firmware updates now. Online or published. I think the nightly builds are more for testing.
    .
    .
    .
    Meine Dreambox One ist ein Stück Scheiße!.
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,268
    Post Thanks / Like
    Here is the screen shot of the image in question.

    Since I like to have my sats separated in to C and Ku bands (see Ses 2 - 87º) as an example, that might be causing the problem for me. The default satellite.xml combines both C and Ku bands in to one header (NSS 7 - 20º). I think I will create a new satellite.xml file combining C and Ku similar to the default for my arc and see if that's the culprit.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    8,287
    Post Thanks / Like
    Look closely at your original screenshot and you will see "Frequency values must be between 10700 and 12740 Mhz".
    You are trying to change the values to something else besides ku band for this satellite? The firmware will not let you do this easily.
    .
    .
    .
    Meine Dreambox One ist ein Stück Scheiße!.
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,268
    Post Thanks / Like
    Yes, I tried to change the values for a Ku sat to 11700-12200 and it will not change anything, no matter what values I input. The values remain the same.

    If I select a C band sat and try to change 3600-4200 to 3700-4200, it changes to 3000-4200. In OpenATV. I have no problems changing these settings to the numbers I want.
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    8,287
    Post Thanks / Like
    Interesting.
    I am running identical firmware and do not have any problems changing the ku frequency on that satellite.
    .
    .
    .
    Meine Dreambox One ist ein Stück Scheiße!.
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,268
    Post Thanks / Like
    Took a while but reloaded and older version of Vix using Meoboot, then did an on-line upgrade and things are back to normal. Now have to play with the VTI blind scan and see how it performs.
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
    #28
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2
    Post Thanks / Like
    Hi... do you have a dealer where one of these boxes can be bought here in the states or are you getting these imported ? ... I don't know if I want to get one of theses or just make a HTPC ...I like the simplicity of a stb
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
    #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    8,287
    Post Thanks / Like
    Plain and simple, I do not suggest purchasing this receiver if you do not have any experience with Enigma2 firmwares.
    .
    .
    .
    Meine Dreambox One ist ein Stück Scheiße!.
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
    #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,268
    Post Thanks / Like
    Just scanned about five C band sats and still going. I am quite satisfied with OpenVix and it's latest version for scanning. Not the fastest mind you, but definitely adequate considering the newness of the image. Once they refine the coding, this receiver should scan as fast as an X2 due to it's fast processor. And, should they add overclocking, this receiver should fly. Back to testing.......
    Reply With Quote
     

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •