CRTC to begin public hearing on wireless code of conduct

woofy

The Master of Disaster
Staff member
Administrator
Cell phone users frustrated with lengthy contracts and hefty roaming fees could soon see some changes as CanadaÂ’s telecommunications regulator begins a public hearing on a wireless code of conduct.

Monday marks the first day of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications CommissionÂ’s week-long hearing that aims to improve protection for wireless customers.

The CRTC had earlier asked Canadians for their input on a new code, with the most-common suggestions including:


A clearer understanding of wireless service fees.
The ability to unlock cellphone on reasonable terms.
The ability to set a cap on additional fees.
Online tools to monitor usage and any additional fees.

A draft “wireless code” was released by the agency late last month and included the possibility of cancelling contracts when the provider changes key terms, clear limits on contract terms and penalties, and a monthly bill cap with extra fees are incurred. The new draft guidelines also provides recourse for consumers -- up to $5,000 in compensation if the code is violated.

The CRTC is asking for the publicÂ’s feedback on its draft wireless code until the hearing wraps up on Feb. 15.

Comments about the draft copy posted on the CRTCÂ’s website shows that one of the publicÂ’s primary complaints is that the proposed code does not address three-year contract terms, which is longer than the majority of developed countries.

“Three years is a long time in the current technology industry and only providing Canadian with this option is unjust,” reads the number one ‘liked’ comment CRTC feedback portal. “We should follow in the footsteps of many other countries and limit these contracts to two years maximum.”

CanadaÂ’s big three wireless providers, Telus, Rogers, and Bell -- which owns CTV -- say they welcome a new code of conduct that will help in improving customer service.
 
They aren't likely to address the 3 year contracts as the wireless companies do not want to see these gone. We have already gone from 1 year, to 2 year and now 3 year terms. Left to the wireless providers, they would likely favor a 4 or 5 year term. They should force all providers to offer "no contract", 1 year, 2 year or 3 year at the consumers choice. This entire facade is not designed to add any serious and significant benefit to the consumer, it is simply to put on a show for the general public and I don't truly expect any significant benefits even though many 3rd world countries have better service for lower cost than Canada. None of that will change until consumers fight back with their pocket books.
 
Back
Top