To complicate things further, it seems that different markets may have a different set of atsc 3.0 problems. I say this because of what has been written by people in different parts of the country.
The Zapperbox M1 can open DRM channels if there is an internet connection. It takes some time for a DRM channel to open on the Zapperbox from the video I have seen of it. The Zapperbox shares some similar looking menus which makes me wonder if the Zapperbox and HDTV Mate are being built from the same source. The Zapperbox costs 4 times the price of the HDTV Mate and appears to have its own set of problems.
https://www.google.com/search?q=zap...B7iAwQYACBBiAYBkAYI&sclient=gws-wiz-serp#ip=1
I think really the main problem for everyone concerned with atsc 3.0 is here:
https://mailchi.mp/atsc/the-standard-old-traditions-new-perspectives-bright-futures?e=63132d8f90
ATSC sends me emails on occasion. They seem to be always either congratulating themselves or making announcements about something. DRM has put a knife in the atsc 3.0 project for the United States. Having to connect to the Internet to make DRM work sounds like some sort of IKS and gives the appearance of being sleazy. WHY is DRM even needed? The ATSC group needs to look at how things are being presented, and they need to look at the problems people are having with atsc 3.0.
The Zapperbox M1 can open DRM channels if there is an internet connection. It takes some time for a DRM channel to open on the Zapperbox from the video I have seen of it. The Zapperbox shares some similar looking menus which makes me wonder if the Zapperbox and HDTV Mate are being built from the same source. The Zapperbox costs 4 times the price of the HDTV Mate and appears to have its own set of problems.
https://www.google.com/search?q=zap...B7iAwQYACBBiAYBkAYI&sclient=gws-wiz-serp#ip=1
I think really the main problem for everyone concerned with atsc 3.0 is here:
https://mailchi.mp/atsc/the-standard-old-traditions-new-perspectives-bright-futures?e=63132d8f90
ATSC sends me emails on occasion. They seem to be always either congratulating themselves or making announcements about something. DRM has put a knife in the atsc 3.0 project for the United States. Having to connect to the Internet to make DRM work sounds like some sort of IKS and gives the appearance of being sleazy. WHY is DRM even needed? The ATSC group needs to look at how things are being presented, and they need to look at the problems people are having with atsc 3.0.
Last edited: