How To Look For & Find 5G Interference in C Band

There have been reports of 5G C band interference in the lower part of the band between 3700-3850 MHz. This portion of the band is supposed to be cleared for the United States, but these lower frequencies are still used by a lot of other countries including Mexico. I imagine that since this portion of the band has been cleared, many people automatically think any anomalies or problems with these frequencies Has To Be C band interference.

This morning I had a problem with a tv channel on 97w. The transponder for the channel is 3780 H with a symbol rate around 6522. The FEC is 5/6, and the transponder is also DVB-S2, 8psk. A quick look at the minimum db lock chart shows I need around 9.5 db to open this channel.

The fta receiver shows I have between 13 and 13.5 db for a signal, which means I should be around 3 db Above the minimum signal amount that is needed tp lock this transponder. So why am I having problems with it this morning?

Here is a screenshot the channel. The top of the picture has artifacts, so it is easy to see a problem.
1_0_1_1_FFFF_0_A450EC4_0_0_0_20230213095535.webp

The fta receiver shows a nice, solid 13-13.5 db signal for this transponder, but that number is not accurate. The fta receiver shows a smoother average of the signal, and is not accurate enough to show spikes and fluctuations of the signal like an analyzer can. What is really happening is the signal is dropping below the threshold for lock briefly, then the signal returns to a level above lock. This is why the tv picture jerks, has audio stutters, or other display problems.

Here is a screenshot of the analyzer with the transponder frequency tagged. The signal strength shown is -49.91dbm
tinysa4_LOGMAG_S11_2023-02-13_09-57-00.webp

Here is another screenshot of the analyzer taken about 1 minute later. The signal strength shown is -50.91dbm
tinysa4_LOGMAG_S11_2023-02-13_09-58-08.webp

The noise floor on the fta receiver is -60dbm. Most fta tuner specs are from about -60 to -30 dbm. A few of the TBS cards may have a more generous noise floor down to about -70dbm. But FTA receivers are usually -60 to -30 dbm or thereabouts.

Using -60 as the noise floor, the first screenshot shows a signal of. So the first analyzer screenshot shows a signal about 10db above the noise floor (60−49.91= 10.09). The second analyzer screenshot shows a signal about 9db above the noise floor (60−50.91=9.09) which is below what the receiver needs to lock the transponder.

The TinySA Ultra is not some wildly accurate piece of testing equipment, but it can give good information and show WHY reception problems exist. Watching the analyzer shows the 3780 H transponder signal going up and down several times a minute. The fta receiver shows more of an average signal, and is not designed to show rapid up or down spikes in signal strength.

All that is happening here is the signal is fluctuation, which causes picture problems. Why the 3780 H signal is jumping up and down is unknown. But the analyzer shows a fairly clean signal. If the problem was 5G interference, then we could expect to see on and off signal spikes surrounding the transponder.

Most likely, the same thing would be seen if other transponders that have equal or similar problems on my satellite receiver were carefully checked. We know some users have experienced actual 5G interference in c band. But it seems now the blame for any little reception problem is 5G.
 
The best way to check for data loss (the picture breaking up due to loss of data bits in the data stream) is with a BER* generator/decoder setup, unfortunately we don't have a way to send a true BER free signal up to the satellite.

When the BER gets too high the FEC* cant fix the loss of data for that decoded byte (or bytes) of signal, then you start getting pixulation or total loss of lines of code

We use to setup on the bench the transmitter, receiver and antennas for a true BER check at low input signals, also with a harmonics generator and co-channel generator, injecting a BER free modulation (zero BER on the receiver) at the transmitter you can then see how the affect of interfering signals can give you a problem when you reach the limit of your FEC.

*BER= Bit Error Rate, the loss of data bits in a digital data stream.
*FEC= Forward Error Correction, used to correct a data stream with missing data bits.

One other thing is the fact that the 5G signals could also be coming from someone using a 5G phone close by, if your in a large city or town then this could be a possibility.

I live out in the boonies, I have a new AT&T cell tower about a mile away, I can just see the top of the tower, I know it has 5G on it as I now use a Netgear hotspot for internet, this device reports it's connection type, it is getting a 5G signal to and from that tower, I also checked my signals, I don't see any problems with them, (I have no way to look at them like El Bandido) the hotspot is located about 35 feet from the receiver and about 150 feet from the dish, and would be about 30 degrees of to the side of my BUD if I'm looking at satellites further East then 97W.
 
I live out in the boonies, I have a new AT&T cell tower about a mile away, I can just see the top of the tower, I know it has 5G on it as I now use a Netgear hotspot for internet, this device reports it's connection type, it is getting a 5G signal to and from that tower, I also checked my signals, I don't see any problems with them, (I have no way to look at them like El Bandido) the hotspot is located about 35 feet from the receiver and about 150 feet from the dish, and would be about 30 degrees of to the side of my BUD if I'm looking at satellites further East then 97W.

But is the 5G you are receiving operating on the C Band Frequencies? Which would be Band 77.

Below quoted from a website updated September 3, 2022:

While AT&T won the 39GHz spectrum in May 2020, itÂ’s still relying on its old 850MHz frequency band to offer low-band 5G to users in the US. The average 5G speed of AT&T mobile network currently is 59.3Mbps. According to a report, AT&T has launched 39GHz 5G in parts of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. ItÂ’s expected that AT&TÂ’s 39GHz 5G will offer speed up to 3Gbps.
Band Frequency Band Type
n260 39GHz mmWave
n5 850MHz Low-band
n77 3.7GHz Mid-band sub-6 GHz
............................................................................................................

mmwave only has a range of like 2 city blocks!
Mid-band (like n77) range is much further.

Edited: Sorry, I misidentified mmwave range for Mid-band range. Corrected above.
 
Last edited:
Also found this: Published Feb 15th, 2022
<quote>
Technically, Mid-Band frequencies are still “Sub-6GHz,” but AT&T is specifically deploying its Mid-Band networks separately to its low-band networks. After months of delays, AT&T has finally deployed its mid-band network — but only in some cities. Mid-band 5G is considered the key to unlocking the dreams of 5G, thanks to the fact that it can cover larger geographic areas with fast connectivity. The cities where AT&T C-Band 5G can be found are below.
Dallas/Fort Worth
Houston
Austin
Chicago
Detroit
Jacksonville
Orlando
Miami
<end quote>

Those mid-bands are what will ruin our C Band Dish world. But may be a long time coming to the boonies... if ever.
 
I have been looking for a device that would cost less and produce similar information as the TinySA Ultra. A software defined dongle seemed interesting so I decided to try one out for about $30.00 in cost. The software defined dongle (sdr) that I chose is nothing more than a modified DVB-T usb tuner. Here is the identification as seen using the "lsusb" command: Bus 002 Device 005: ID 0bda:2838 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTL2838 DVB-T.

SDR devices usually only work to around 1.7-2 GHz, which is way short of satellite c band frequencies. But most c band lnbs used in North America convert down to 950-1450 MHz or thereabouts which would possibly make the DVB-T sdr dongle useful for looking at signals through the lnb. Free computer interfaces can be found, but none of them that I have seen have enough frequency coverage to be useful in detecting c band interference.

A DVB-T tuner is designed to cover a few MHz which probably limits its capabilities as a wide band scanner. The sdr interferes that I found only show a few MHz in range, but we really need something capable of showing at least several hundred MHz of range in order to be useful for identifying or locating c band interference. Shown below are some screenshots of a sdr interface using DVB-T sdr dongle and the TinySA Ultra for comparison.

A satellite transponder is too large to be shown on the sdr interface, so I used a satellite beacon as an example.

Here is the sdr interface showing a satellite beacon. Note that only a couple of MHz in spectrum can be shown:
Screenshot from 2023-02-15 21-40-52.webp

Here is the TinySA Ultra showing the same satellite beacon, and also showing the entire range fo frequencies for the lnb:
tinysa4_LOGMAG_S11_2023-02-15_23-40-18.webp

This particular Software Defined Radio setup will be useless for c band interference checks because it does not have enough range. We need to see at least 100 MHz, preferably 2-300 MHz when searching for c band interference. So the software defined radio setup shown above is not going to work unless some major changes can be made.

I purchased PLZ‑SA354400B analyzer that cost roughly half the price of the TinySA Ultra. Shipping time for this device is estimated at two weeks. You can only do so much with cheap stuff. The TinySA Ultra is useful for finding c band interference, and is also useful for other things related to satellite tv. But I would like to find something that has similar capabilities that costs less money. We will see....
 
I don't see SDR Console covering over a few MHz. Any ideas on how to make it display a 50 - 100 MHz spread?

That SDR Software Defined Radio Receiver looks nice. I am not interested in buying anything else right now. Maybe you or someone else will try it???
 
Very meaningful discussion and sharing, testing is serious. LNB has been designed by me for 20 years, and it is certain that 5G communication will interfere with C-band TVRO. Now it is mainly because too many fake products have misled the market and consumers. Too many Passive filters and LNB in the market are not capable of fully resisting 5G interference. If the protection belt is only 20MHZ in the future, Passive filter and WR229 LNB must be adopted (when you need to receive horizontal polarization and vertical polarization, you also need OMT). 5G frequency interference with TVRO system will lead to a large number of intermodulation of LNB products, so that STB cannot modulate and demodulate. We have the product technology, but we don't have loyal customers. 5G interference with home TVRO and FSS will be more obvious in the future
 
I want to give a comprehensive explanation of LNB recently, especially for the interference of 5G communication frequency and C-BAND TVRO, and really explain the work of LNB in 5G frequency. With the gradual opening of 5G mobile communication, how to select truly effective LNB, especially for LNB NOISE, REJECTION, P1DB, Rejection. There are too many false product publicity in the market, which is poison to consumers. Most LNBS in the market, including many well-known brands, have false publicity. I will explain and show them in the future, and observe them through signal source interference test and spectrum analyzer test. The false hype has slowed the development of 5G, while affecting satellite TVRO's home entertainment.
 
I want to give a comprehensive explanation of LNB recently, especially for the interference of 5G communication frequency and C-BAND TVRO, and really explain the work of LNB in 5G frequency. With the gradual opening of 5G mobile communication, how to select truly effective LNB, especially for LNB NOISE, REJECTION, P1DB, Rejection. There are too many false product publicity in the market, which is poison to consumers. Most LNBS in the market, including many well-known brands, have false publicity. I will explain and show them in the future, and observe them through signal source interference test and spectrum analyzer test. The false hype has slowed the development of 5G, while affecting satellite TVRO's home entertainment.

Welcome to Legitfta!
You are welcome to provide any useful information, but there are not many products available for 5G c band interference right now.
 
No satellite thread would be complete without Rainiersatellite! They have everything needed to combat the 5G c band interference problem. Let's examine the Rainiersatellite info on 5G a bit. Two .PDF files are attached. Here is part of what is in them.

<START>
Q: Do I have a 5G interference problem?
A: If you previously received the signal well and all of a sudden is giving you problems it
could be 5G has fired up in your area. 5G usually will show you a high signal strength with “0” Quality and no signal lock or Quality dropping to 0 every 5 to 10 seconds on your
receiver.

Q: I get pixilation in my picture that comes and goes do I have 5G interference?
A: While pixilation can be caused by weak signal it could also be milder 5G. Check dish
alignment. If all is correct you probably experiencing a mild form of 5G interference. If
that is the case our filters will clean it up.

Q: I have a 8 foot or smaller dish. Will your filter help?
A: We recommend at least our 9 foot satellite dish or larger due to attenuation of satellite
signal when using a 5G filter Rainier stocks 9 foot to 16.4 foot solid 5G rejection reflectors.

Q: Will any LNB work with your filter?
A: While any LNB could be used the best performance is achieved when using our Norsat
3120 PLL LNB.

Q: Do I need the RED or BLUE filter?
A: I depends what frequency signals range you need to receive. For maximum protection
once 5G is fully deployed in 2023 we recommend the BLUE filter.Why does a 5G signal interfere with your satellite signal?
This is due to the simple fact that the local terrestrial signal is much stronger then the satellite signal.
This overloads the LNB and or the receivers front end.
(see spectrum analysis below)
How to solve the problem.
The only way to solve this is to use a special bandpass filter between your LNB and feedhorn. This will
attenuate the offending 5G signals prevent current or future problems.

<END>

Pretty easy to see all Rainiersatellite wants to do is sell you something, whether you need it or not. Stupid to suggest a Norsat 3120 lnb because it operates in the frequencies you would be trying to reject.

Funny that a 9 foot dish is suggested over an 8 foot dish. There is no logical reason for this except Rainiersatellite would like to sell you a 9 foot dish. Only help here is the pocketbook of Rainier. A bigger dish might help, but it would need to be Bigger. A foot of size difference would help the interference problem little if any on 2 equal quality dish antennas.

No mention of relocating the dish either. More or less, if you have problems, then buy his products. Again the .pdf files are attached in case someone wants to see them.

Also no mention of lnbs that are designed to reject 5G c band signals. The reason for this is Rainier doesn't sell them.
 

Attachments

Forgot to mention that Rick Caylor is currently selling the same 5G filters that Rainier has. Looks like Rick wants about 100 dollars less per filter. So you lose about 200 dollars if you buy a pair of 5G filters from Rainier.
 
This is not new info, but something I had not considered before:
5G interference on C Band dishes isn't the only problem. Been reading how some people have already needed filters for OTA TV due to LTE interference. More problems are likely to arise because T-Mobile Home Internet 5G is expanding use of the 600-700Mhz spectrum. (Band 71,IIRC) This was formerly TV channels 38-50. The proximity makes it more likely to bleed down to the remaining TV UHF channels. One site with info:

Code:
https://www.techhive.com/article/583038/lte-filters-for-tv-antennas.html

The good news: Even if you should need a filter for your OTA antenna... It isn't near as expensive as one for your c Band dish. :thumbup:
 
After many years of his BS, hard to believe he is still in business.

He must be the greatest salesman in the world. After checking out the channel lineups.... I see almost nothing that I can't get FTA on C Band. Other than Sports which I personally don't want. Maybe good for a sports fan?

I don't see a 'premium' movie channels listed anywhere. Am I missing something somewhere?

Now IF a person didn't have a Bud, and IF the service was on KU... I could maybe see some value.

Just my 2 coppers.
 
OTA or terrestrial television interference is not a problem for me. My highest tv station in frequency is 605 MHz. I have not seen any problems with the channels on 605 MHz when my T-Mobile Home Internet is operating in the 600 MHz range, Others may not be so fortunate.

Listed below are some links that mainly deal with rtl-sdr devices. I have listed them since software defined radio or sdr was mentioned as a possibility for finding c band interference. From everything that I have seen, sdr devices will not be very useful for looking at or finding satellite c band interference. The sdr system is too narrow to see enough frequency spectrum at one time to be useful. SDR devices are useful for other things that are satellite reflated, and this is why the links are listed below.

The 60 dollar frequency analyzer should be here tomorrow, or maybe Friday. When it gets here depends on how the postal service feels about delivering it. Will be interesting to see how well it works as compared to the TinySA Ultra.


SDR related links:
https://goughlui.com/2013/11/10/rtl-sdr-a-tool-for-visualizing-broadcast-satellite-signals/,


https://www.rtl-sdr.com/receiving-satellite-tv-beacons-rtl-sdr-lnb/


Satellite Beacon List:
http://frequencyplansatellites.altervista.org/Beacon-Telemetry_Americas.html
 
"More problems are likely to arise because T-Mobile Home Internet 5G is expanding use of the 600-700Mhz spectrum. (Band 71,IIRC) This was formerly TV channels 38-50. The proximity makes it more likely to bleed down to the remaining TV UHF channels."

I had that problem when T-Mobile switched.... had to drive about 35 miles to the Channel Master distribution warehouse located near the Phoenix Mesa Gateway airport and spoke to one of the techs there about the reception problems I was having. He suggested to try the attached filter and if it didn't work he would give me a refund. Works great!

Screenshot_2023-02-23_004203.webp
 
"More problems are likely to arise because T-Mobile Home Internet 5G is expanding use of the 600-700Mhz spectrum. (Band 71,IIRC) This was formerly TV channels 38-50. The proximity makes it more likely to bleed down to the remaining TV UHF channels."

I had that problem when T-Mobile switched.... had to drive about 35 miles to the Channel Master distribution warehouse located near the Phoenix Mesa Gateway airport and spoke to one of the techs there about the reception problems I was having. He suggested to try the attached filter and if it didn't work he would give me a refund. Works great!

View attachment 17661

I actually checked the latest Channel Master LTE/5G filter that starts at 608Mhz, with a spectrum analyzer. It kills LTE/5G deader than a door-nail. It's also power-passing, if that's important to you However, it does slightly KNICK RF36.

IMO, it's the top of the line for people needing this sort of filter, and the price isn't that bad.
 
Excellent info!
https://www.channelmaster.com/products/tv-antenna-lte-filter-cm-3201

The link above shows the OTA filter and also states it has a 30 day free trial. I may try one!
Filter specs:
Frequencies Pass = 5 - 608 MHz
Frequencies Block = 609 - 3000 MHz

Here is what one of my OTA antennas looks like when viewed through the TinySA Ultra:
tinysa4_LOGMAG_S11_2023-02-23_12-00-54.webp

For reference, I marked my last tv transponder, which is 605 MHz. I also marked roughly where cell services begin, which is around 620 MHz. The details of these two marks can be seen in the top right of the screencapture.
The OTA tv frequencies are of course to the left of the 605 MHz mark, and cell frequencies to the right of the 605 MHz mark. So it is easy to see the cell signals are much stronger than the OTA frequencies.

Also there is a fat group of scraggly-looking lines starting about 740 MHz and running to 770 MHz. Some of these lines seem to be on Time Division Duplex (TDD) and transmit intermittently.

The cellular C band signals are also TDD and transmit intermittent. So you need a device that has a fast response time and is able to capture groups of frequencies over a decent range of spectrum. A RTL-SDR or any Software Defined Radio System are probably not capable of displaying a group of frequencies such as those seen above between 740 and 770 MHz.

Also a 30 MHz group scraggly looking lines similar to what is seen above between 740 and 770 MHz will tear c band reception to pieces IF they are in the c band spectrum. This is why some people are having problems in C band. I have seen a similar group of scraggly looking lines that were actually in Satellite C band when visiting downtown Atlanta.

I will see if I can get one of those Channel Master OTA filters so we can see what id does to the unwanted signals. I bet that whole group of signals between 740 and 770 MHz disappears once the Channel Master filter is installed. There is really no way to hide how effective or ineffective the filter is. Simply take a sample of analyzer screen recordings before installing the filter, then take a sample of recordings after installing the filter. A comparison of the two samples will show exactly what the filter does or does not do.
 
Back
Top