I would like the Tnap team to build a test image for qviart dual 4k
full specifications
receips at oe-allience
full specifications
receips at oe-allience
Tnap 6.0 for qviart dual 4k
- Thread starter greatpain
- Start date
Hi
Welcome to Legitfta!
Do you understand how to test the dual4k and understand how to recover if the image fails to boot?
Welcome to Legitfta!
Do you understand how to test the dual4k and understand how to recover if the image fails to boot?
yes I have good experience in enigma2 images
OK.
How would TNAP 6 benefit you and this receiver? What will we gain by building this image for it? I have a Qviart dual somewhere. I never use it because it did not perform well for me. The problem is I do not know if TNAP 6 will boot on the Qviart dual....
How would TNAP 6 benefit you and this receiver? What will we gain by building this image for it? I have a Qviart dual somewhere. I never use it because it did not perform well for me. The problem is I do not know if TNAP 6 will boot on the Qviart dual....
there are many things that made me interested into this image:
1- the full support of blindscan and pid scanner of transponders
2- the support of band stacked c-band lnbf
and some other stuff
Qviart Dual 4K EXPERIMENTAL
TNAP Images - Satellite Receiver Firmware Downloads
Official source for TNAP satellite receiver firmware. Secure, verified downloads with comprehensive security monitoring.
tnapimages.com
You can watch TV with the Qviart dual, but it is a very disappointing receiver. OpenPLi says: "Due to lack of technical support from the manufacturer we are no longer able to provide active support for the brand Qviart."
The main problem with the Qviart dual is it was released without manufacture support. No efforts were made to improve the receiver, and it was released as an unfinished product. Anyway, images are up for it at the moment. But as a FTA blindscan receiver, the Qviart Dual is lacking to say the least!
The performance difference is stark:
SF8008 (AVL62X1/Si2166D): 2082 channels in 4:44 (439 channels/minute)
Dual (M1502A): 1313 channels in 11:56 (110 channels/minute)
SF8008 finds 59% more channels and scans 4x faster than dual.
Qviart Dual 105w-C Band Blindscan Results:
SF8008 (AVL62X1) 105w-C Band Blindscan Results:
The main problem with the Qviart dual is it was released without manufacture support. No efforts were made to improve the receiver, and it was released as an unfinished product. Anyway, images are up for it at the moment. But as a FTA blindscan receiver, the Qviart Dual is lacking to say the least!
The performance difference is stark:
SF8008 (AVL62X1/Si2166D): 2082 channels in 4:44 (439 channels/minute)
Dual (M1502A): 1313 channels in 11:56 (110 channels/minute)
SF8008 finds 59% more channels and scans 4x faster than dual.
Qviart Dual 105w-C Band Blindscan Results:
SF8008 (AVL62X1) 105w-C Band Blindscan Results:
Last edited: